Pensions, Funding and Risk
نویسندگان
چکیده
In this paper, we identify the economic system in which occupational pension schemes operate. This system includes all parties to the pension arrangement, particularly the members of the scheme and the shareholders of the sponsoring company. This requires us to model the pension scheme not as a self-contained fund, but simultaneously alongside the company, and to recognise its interaction with other parties with financial interests in the scheme. Under this method, the stakes of the various parties aggregate to 100% of the assets of the company including the assets of the pension scheme. The power of this approach is that decisions taken in relation to the management of the pension scheme can be assessed by the effect they have on the way in which the overall economic value of the company is divided between stakeholders.
منابع مشابه
Funding unfunded pensions
For many larger multinational companies, unfunded pensions represent an unmanaged risk and a growing liability. With the removal of the ‘corridor’ in the new IFRS IAS19R accounting regulations, unfunded pensions have become an increased source of volatility on the corporate balance sheet. Despite this, until today, funding unfunded pensions locally has either been too expensive or not possible....
متن کاملExecutive Compensation and the Cost of Debt
We examine how executive compensation affects the cost of debt financing. Analyzing CEO pay data from the UK, we find that debt-like and equity-like pay components have opposite effects on the cost of debt. An increase in defined benefit pensions is associated with lower bond yield spread, while an increase in executive stock options intensifies it. In addition, we find some evidence that cash ...
متن کاملOptimal Public Pensions: Full Coverage for End-of-Life Consumption
Public pensions and private saving are commonly considered complementary funding sources from which the elderly should draw simultaneously throughout their retirement. This paper shows that sequential use of funding sources would be significantly more effi cient —a period of entirely private funding followed by a period of consumption fully financed by public pensions. Thus the standard multi-p...
متن کاملPension Fund Governance and the Choice
Recent events in several countries have underscored the importance of good governance in private occupational pension plans. The present paper uses contract theory to analyze the interplay of residual claims and control rights in private pensions. The residual claimant is the plan sponsor in a defined benefit (DB) plan and the pool of beneficiaries in a defined contribution (DC) plan. The main ...
متن کاملPension Plan Funding, Risk Sharing and Technology Choice
The paper presents an analysis of the impact of pension plan funding on workers’ saving and portfolio behaviour. It shows that the impact of pension plan funding and asset allocation on the economy’s technology choices depends upon the constraints facing worker’s in the capital market. The failure of equivalence propositions between defined benefit and defined contribution pension plans derives...
متن کاملShould Public Retirement Plans be Fully Funded ?
Most state and local retirement plans strive for full funding, at least by actuarial standards. Funding measured at market values fluctuates and often falls short. A common argument for full funding is that pensions are a form of deferred compensation that does not justify a debt. The paper examines public finance, political economy, and financial market issues that bear on optimal funding, bro...
متن کامل